<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
                  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id></journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
</journal-title-group>
<issn></issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<permissions>
</permissions>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p><bold>Awareness of Lung Cancer and Associated Factors among Public
Health Students at Kabul University of Medical Sciences, Afghanistan: A
Cross-Sectional Study</bold></p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="18%" />
      <col width="62%" />
      <col width="20%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_27cc9a36c60f4fcfa5bb38f712e77b1b/media/image1.jpeg" />ajbms.knu.edu.af</th>
        <th><p><bold>Afghanistan Journal of Basic Medical
        Sciences</bold></p>
        <p>2025 Jan 2(2): 176-186.</p></th>
        <th><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_27cc9a36c60f4fcfa5bb38f712e77b1b/media/image2.png" />
        <p>ISSN: 3005-6632</p></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p>*Bashir Ahmad Qudrati <sup>1</sup>, Rohullah Sakhi <sup>2</sup>,
Zarif Haidari <sup>1</sup>, Naweedullah Noori <sup>1</sup></p>
<list list-type="order">
  <list-item>
    <p><italic>Public Health Faculty, Kabul University of Medical
    Sciences, Kabul, Afghanistan</italic></p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p><italic>Environmental and Occupational Health, Public Health
    Faculty, Kabul University of Medical Sciences, Kabul,
    Afghanistan</italic></p>
  </list-item>
</list>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="30%" />
      <col width="70%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>A R ART I C L E I N F O</bold></th>
        <th><bold>A B S T R A C T</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td><p><bold>Type: Original Article</bold></p>
        <p>Received: 05 May 2025</p>
        <p>Accepted: 29 June, 2025</p>
        <p><sup>*</sup>Corresponding Author:</p>
        <p>E-mails: bashirqudrati786@gmail.com</p>
        <p><bold>To cite this article:</bold> Qudrati BA, Sakhi R,
        Haidari Z, Noori N. Awareness of Lung Cancer and Associated
        Factors among Public Health Students at Kabul University of
        Medical Sciences, Afghanistan: A Cross-Sectional Study.</p>
        <p>Afghanistan Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2025 Jan
        2(2):176-186.</p>
        <p><bold><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.62134/khatamuni.82">https://doi.org/10.62134/khatamuni.82</ext-link></bold></p></td>
        <td><p><bold>Background:</bold> Lung cancer is the leading cause
        of cancer-related mortality worldwide, imposing a significant
        burden on low- and middle-income countries, including
        Afghanistan. Contributing factors include aging populations,
        tobacco use, and other high-risk behaviors. We aimed to assess
        lung cancer awareness and associated factors among public health
        students at Kabul University of Medical Sciences.</p>
        <p><bold>Methods:</bold> A descriptive cross-sectional study was
        conducted among 167 students between Oct and Dec 2024 using a
        multi-stage stratified sampling method. Data were analyzed using
        SPSS. Descriptive statistics summarized demographics and
        awareness levels, and chi-square tests assessed associations
        between awareness and demographic variables, with a significance
        threshold of <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05.</p>
        <p><bold>Results:</bold> Out of 167 distributed questionnaires,
        164 were completed (response rate 98.2%). Most participants
        (62.2%) were aged 21-24 yr. A majority (80.5%) demonstrated good
        awareness of lung cancer risk factors, with 98.2% identifying
        smoking and 76.2% identifying passive smoking as key risks.
        Awareness of occupational exposures (63.4%) and dietary risks
        (68.9%) was moderate. No statistically significant associations
        were observed between awareness and demographic variables such
        as age (<italic>P</italic>=0.439), year of study
        (<italic>P</italic>=0.415), or economic status
        (<italic>P</italic>=0.91).</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> While students exhibited high
        awareness of smoking-related risks, gaps remained in recognizing
        less-discussed risk factors and symptoms. These findings
        highlight the need for targeted educational interventions to
        address knowledge gaps and promote preventive health behaviors
        among students.</p>
        <p><bold>Keywords:</bold> Lung cancer awareness, Risk factors,
        Afghanistan, Medical students</p></td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><bold>Introduction</bold></p>
<p></p>
<p>Cancer represents a significant global health issue, standing as the
second leading cause of mortality across the world. Based on estimates,
the year 2020 witnessed approximately 9.6 million deaths attributed to
cancer, alongside 18.1 million newly reported cases of the disease on a
global scale (1-3). Lung cancer ranks as the most frequently diagnosed
form of cancer and holds the grim distinction of being the leading cause
of cancer-related mortality worldwide. In 2020, approximately 2.21
million new cases and 1.8 million deaths were reported (1). According to
the WHO, nearly one in five cancer-related deaths (18.4%) that year was
attributed to lung cancer (1). By 2020, lung cancer maintained its
position as the deadliest cancer, causing 1.8 million deaths, while it
also became the second most commonly diagnosed cancer globally,
surpassed only by breast cancer, with 2.21 million new cases that year
(2).</p>
<p>Lung cancer is observed more frequently in low- and middle-income
countries, where the rate of cancer-related deaths continues to climb.
This increase can be attributed to aging populations and the prevalence
of common risk factors such as tobacco use, alcohol consumption,
unhealthy dietary habits, and physical inactivity. In 2012, these
nations were responsible for 65% of all cancer-related fatalities
worldwide, and projections suggest this share could rise to 75% by 2030
(4, 5). Afghanistan, like other low-income nations, faces similar
challenges. In 2012, WHO reported that cancer claimed the lives of
15,000 Afghans, including 8,100 men and 7,400 women, with lung cancer
listed as one of the primary contributors to cancer-related mortality
(3).</p>
<p>Globally, smoking remains the most significant risk factor for lung
cancer, responsible for nearly 70% of related deaths. Smokers are
approximately 20 times more likely to die from this disease compared to
those who do not smoke (6, 7). Lung cancer poses a significant public
health challenge due to its high mortality rate and the limited
likelihood of survival. This issue is particularly severe in developing
nations, where survival rates are less than one-third of those observed
in more developed countries, highlighting a stark disparity in outcomes
(1).</p>
<p>The occurrence of lung cancer is heavily shaped by various factors,
such as an aging population, increased life expectancy, and the
prevalence of high-risk habits, particularly tobacco use (8, 9). Smoking
alone contributes to over 30% of all cancer-related deaths, with lung
cancer accounting for 80% of these fatalities (10, 11). Although lung
cancer affects both genders, it is more frequently diagnosed in men than
in women (12). Persistent symptoms, such as a chronic cough, often serve
as critical indicators of the disease and play an essential role in
determining its prognosis (13-15).</p>
<p>Lung cancer plays a significant role in Afghanistan's cancer-related
mortality, reflecting patterns observed worldwide. According to the
latest WHO data published in 2020, lung cancer deaths in Afghanistan
reached 1,076, accounting for 0.46% of total deaths. The age-adjusted
mortality rate for lung, tracheal, and bronchial cancers is 6.90 per
100,000 of the population, ranking Afghanistan 122nd globally. These
statistics are consistent with the general patterns of cancer mortality
observed worldwide, where lung cancer remains a leading cause of
cancer-related death (16).</p>
<p>Although limited studies have assessed lung cancer awareness and
associated factors in various populations, no research to date has
specifically examined awareness of lung cancer and its associated
factors among public health students at Kabul University of Medical
Sciences, Afghanistan. This study fills a significant gap in the
existing literature, as public health students represent future
healthcare professionals who will play a critical role in health
education, disease prevention, and community awareness. This gap is
particularly important because the level of awareness in this group can
have a substantial impact on early detection and preventive efforts
related to lung cancer in Afghanistan. The present study is the first of
its kind in Afghanistan, providing baseline data on lung cancer
awareness among public health students, and lays the foundation for
future research in this field.</p>
<p>By addressing this gap, the study aimed to explore lung cancer
awareness and associated factors among public health students at Kabul
University of Medical Sciences. It provides the first empirical evidence
in this specific population in Afghanistan, contributing to the
development of targeted educational interventions and public health
strategies aimed at improving awareness, early detection, and prevention
of lung cancer. Filling this gap is significant as it will help
strengthen educational programs, enhance the capacity of public health
students for community education, and ultimately contribute to reducing
the burden of non-communicable diseases like lung cancer in
Afghanistan.</p>
<p><bold>Materials and Methods</bold></p>
<p><italic><bold>Study design and setting</bold></italic></p>
<p>This study is a descriptive cross-sectional study based on a
questionnaire conducted to assess lung cancer awareness and associated
factors among public health students at Kabul University of Medical
Sciences (one of the largest and oldest medical universities in
Afghanistan). The study was carried out between Oct and Dec 2024.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Sample Size and Sampling Method</bold></italic></p>
<p>In 2024, the Public Health Faculty included a total of 272
undergraduate students (from first to fourth year). To determine the
sample size, a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error were
considered. Using Cochran's formula and Epi Info software version 7.2.6,
the initial sample size was calculated to be 159 students. To account
for a potential 5% non-response rate, the final sample size was
increased to 167 students.</p>
<p>In this study, a two-step stratified random sampling method was
applied to ensure proper representation across academic years. First,
the students were grouped into strata according to their academic year
(class). Then, within each stratum, participants were selected using
simple random sampling, with the sample size proportional to the number
of students in each academic year. This stratification ensured that each
academic year was proportionately represented in the final sample.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Data Source and Measurement</bold></italic></p>
<p>The standardized questionnaire, adapted from previous research (17,
18), was modified to suit the context of this study. Specifically,
certain items were reworded to ensure clarity and relevance to the study
population. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: the first
section (7 questions) collected demographic data, the second section (5
questions) assessed awareness of lung cancer risk factors, and the third
section (9 questions) measured general awareness about lung cancer. Each
correct response was awarded 2 points, incorrect answers were given 0
points, and “don’t know” responses were assigned 1 point. The total
possible score was 28 points, with participants scoring above 14
classifieds as having good awareness and those scoring below 14
classifieds as having poor awareness. The questionnaire was translated
into the local language to ensure clarity and ease of understanding for
participants. To ensure reliability and validity, a pilot study was
conducted with 20 students who were excluded from the main sample. The
questionnaire was designed in closed-ended, multiple-choice questions to
facilitate ease of completion in less than ten minutes and to minimize
recall bias.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Ethics Approval</bold></italic></p>
<p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of
the Public Health Faculty at Kabul University of Medical Sciences issued
approval 109/2024. Participation was entirely voluntary, and each
participant provided written informed consent before participation. All
information was collected and stored anonymously, with no identifying
details recorded. The study adhered to the institutional guidelines,
national ethical standards, and respected Afghan cultural norms and
traditions. Measures were taken to protect participants from any
physical or psychological harm, ensuring their rights, safety, and
well-being throughout the study.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Statistical Analysis</bold></italic></p>
<p>To conduct the statistical analysis, the collected data were entered
into SPSS ver. 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics,
including mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage, were
first employed to summarize the data. To describe categorical variables
and the demographics of the participants, frequency distributions and
percentages were used. To determine the relationship between awareness
levels and demographic variables based on participants' characteristics,
cross-tabulation and Chi-square tests were applied to investigate the
relationships and associations between categorical variables. A
<italic>P</italic>-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically
significant.</p>
<p><bold>Results</bold></p>
<p><italic><bold>Students’ Sociodemographic
Characteristics</bold></italic></p>
<p>Out of 167 questionnaires, 164 were fully completed and collected
(response rate 98.2%). Demographic characteristics are detailed in
(Table 1). The participants' ages were divided into two age groups:
18–20 yr and 21–24 yr. The majority of participants, 102 (62.2%),
belonged to the 21–24 age group. The mean age of the participants was
20.9, with a standard deviation of 1.41. Only 5.5% reported a family
history of lung cancer, and 19.5% of the participants had a history of
smoking. As illustrated in (Figure 1), students reported diverse sources
of information about lung cancer. The most commonly cited sources were
books or articles 54 (33.01%), followed by the Internet 42 (25.73%).</p>
<p><bold>Table 1:</bold> Demographic characteristics of the
participants</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="42%" />
      <col width="18%" />
      <col width="19%" />
      <col width="21%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Demographic characteristics</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Categories</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Number</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Percentage</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Age Group</td>
        <td>18-20</td>
        <td>62</td>
        <td>37.8</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>21-24</td>
        <td>102</td>
        <td>62.2</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="4">Year of education</td>
        <td>1st year</td>
        <td>35</td>
        <td>21.3</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>2nd year</td>
        <td>38</td>
        <td>23.2</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>3rd year</td>
        <td>52</td>
        <td>31.7</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>4th year</td>
        <td>39</td>
        <td>23.8</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Economic Status</td>
        <td>Good</td>
        <td>18</td>
        <td>11</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Average</td>
        <td>134</td>
        <td>81.7</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Poor</td>
        <td>12</td>
        <td>7.3</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Marital status</td>
        <td>Single</td>
        <td>151</td>
        <td>92.1</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Married</td>
        <td>13</td>
        <td>7.9</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Family History of Lung Cancer</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>9</td>
        <td>5.5</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Unknown</td>
        <td>20</td>
        <td>12.2</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>135</td>
        <td>82.3</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Smoking History of participants</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>32</td>
        <td>19.5</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>132</td>
        <td>80.5</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Notes: Data are presented as Number (N) and percentage (%). No
statistical analysis was applied.</p>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_27cc9a36c60f4fcfa5bb38f712e77b1b/media/image4.png" />
<p><bold>Figure 1:</bold> Sources of information about lung cancer. The
bar chart illustrates the percentage distribution of individuals
obtaining information about lung cancer from four different sources.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Students’ Awareness Levels about Lung
Cancer</bold></italic></p>
<p>The majority of students 132 (80.49%) had a good level of awareness
about lung cancer and its risk factors, while a smaller proportion 32
(19.51%) demonstrated poor awareness (Figure 2). This overall positive
awareness level indicates a relatively strong understanding of the topic
among the student population.</p>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_27cc9a36c60f4fcfa5bb38f712e77b1b/media/image5.png" />
<p><bold>Figure 2:</bold> The pie chart illustrates the distribution of
students' awareness levels, divided into two categories: good awareness
and poor awareness.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Students’ Awareness of Risk Factors of Lung
Cancer</bold></italic></p>
<p>Participants showed high awareness of major risk factors for lung
cancer (Table 2). Nearly all respondents 161 (98.2%) correctly
identified smoking as a key risk factor. A substantial proportion also
recognized the risks associated with alcohol consumption 129 (78.7%) and
passive smoking 125 (76.2%). Awareness was lower for less commonly
emphasized risk factors: fried and processed foods 113 (68.9%) and
occupational exposure 104 (63.4%). Notably, nearly one-third of students
did not associate dietary habits or occupational exposures with lung
cancer, indicating potential gaps in public health education.</p>
<p><bold>Table 2:</bold> Awareness of Lung Cancer Risk Factors</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="45%" />
      <col width="22%" />
      <col width="16%" />
      <col width="18%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Variables</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Categories</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Number</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Percentage</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Is smoking a risk factor for lung cancer?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>161</td>
        <td>98.2%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>3</td>
        <td>1.8%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Are fried and processed foods a risk factor for
        lung cancer?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>113</td>
        <td>68.9%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>51</td>
        <td>31.1%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Is alcohol a risk factor for lung cancer?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>129</td>
        <td>78.7%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>35</td>
        <td>21.3%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Is passive smoking an inactive risk factor for
        lung cancer?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>125</td>
        <td>76.2%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>39</td>
        <td>23.8%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">Is an occupational exposure a risk factor for
        lung cancer?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>104</td>
        <td>63.4%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>60</td>
        <td>36.6%</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Notes: Data are presented as Number (N) and percentage (%). No
statistical analysis was applied.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Students’ Awareness about Lung
Cancer</bold></italic></p>
<p>As shown in (Table 3), 125 (76.2%) of participants were aware that
lung cancer is among the most common cancers, and 115 (70.1%) correctly
identified it as a leading cause of death. Awareness of prevention and
lifestyle factors was moderate, 116 (70.7%) believed that exercise can
reduce lung cancer risk, and 106 (64.6%) believed that lung cancer is
preventable. However, 44 (26.8%) of students reported uncertainty
regarding the preventability of lung cancer. Regarding age and risk, 118
(72%) of participants recognized that older adults are at higher risk,
whereas awareness of genetic and hereditary components was relatively
low. Only 23 (14%) believed lung cancer is genetic, and 24 (14.6%)
believed it is inherited, while a significant proportion were unsure.
These findings reflect strong understanding of lifestyle-related risk
factors but limited knowledge of genetic predisposition.</p>
<p>Among the symptoms of lung cancer, the most recognized symptom among
students was shortness of breath, identified by 52 (31.72%).
Additionally, weight loss and hemoptysis were each identified by 38
(22.91%) as symptoms of lung cancer (Figure 3).</p>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_27cc9a36c60f4fcfa5bb38f712e77b1b/media/image6.png" />
<p><bold>Figure 3:</bold> Common Symptoms of Lung Cancer. This figure
highlights the primary symptoms associated with lung cancer, including
persistent cough, shortness of breath, hemoptysis, and weight loss,
emphasizing the varying prevalence of these symptoms among patients.</p>
<p><bold>Table 3:</bold> Awareness about lung cancer</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="53%" />
      <col width="18%" />
      <col width="14%" />
      <col width="15%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Variables</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Categories</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Number</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Percentage</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Do you know that lung cancer is one of the most
        common cancers?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>125</td>
        <td>76.2</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>22</td>
        <td>13.4</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>17</td>
        <td>10.4</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Do you know that lung cancer is one of the
        leading causes of death?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>115</td>
        <td>70.1</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>25</td>
        <td>15.2</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>24</td>
        <td>14.6</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Does exercising help reduce the risk of lung
        cancer?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>116</td>
        <td>70.7</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>13</td>
        <td>7.9</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>35</td>
        <td>21.3</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Is lung cancer preventable?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>106</td>
        <td>64.6</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>14</td>
        <td>8.5</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>44</td>
        <td>26.8</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Can lung cancer occur at any age?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>105</td>
        <td>64</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>17</td>
        <td>10.4</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>42</td>
        <td>25.6</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Are older adults at a higher risk of developing
        lung cancer?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>118</td>
        <td>72</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>10</td>
        <td>6.1</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>36</td>
        <td>22</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Is lung cancer a genetic disease?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>23</td>
        <td>14</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>90</td>
        <td>54.9</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>51</td>
        <td>31.1</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="3">Is lung cancer an inherited disease?</td>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>24</td>
        <td>14.6</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>103</td>
        <td>62.8</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Do not Know</td>
        <td>37</td>
        <td>22.6</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Notes: Data are presented as Number (N) and percentage (%). No
statistical analysis was applied.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Factors associated with level of awareness and
demographic</bold></italic></p>
<p>The analysis of factors associated with the level of awareness and
demographic variables is presented in (Table 4). The analysis revealed
that awareness levels were generally high across all groups; however,
there were no significant differences between age groups (χ² = 0.598,
<italic>P</italic>=0.439) or educational years (χ²=2.855,
<italic>P</italic>=0.415). Participants with different economic statuses
exhibited similar levels of awareness, with no meaningful variation
observed (χ²=0.189, <italic>P</italic>=0.910). Likewise, marital status,
family history of lung cancer, and smoking history did not show any
notable impact on awareness levels (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05).
Overall, demographic factors played a limited role in influencing
awareness about lung cancer, highlighting consistency in awareness
levels across diverse groups.</p>
<p><bold>Table 4:</bold> Factors associated with level of awareness and
Demographic</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="42%" />
      <col width="20%" />
      <col width="20%" />
      <col width="9%" />
      <col width="10%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Variables</bold></th>
        <th colspan="2"><bold>Awareness Level N(%)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>χ 2</bold></th>
        <th><bold>P-</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td></td>
        <td>Good</td>
        <td>Poor</td>
        <td></td>
        <td><bold>value</bold></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td colspan="5">Age Group (yr)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>18-20</td>
        <td>48 (77.4c)</td>
        <td>14 (22.6)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.598</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.439</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>21-24</td>
        <td>84 (82.4)</td>
        <td>18 (17.6)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td colspan="5">Year of education</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>1st year</td>
        <td>27 (77.1)</td>
        <td>8 (22.9)</td>
        <td rowspan="4">2.855</td>
        <td rowspan="4">0.415</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>2nd year</td>
        <td>30 (78.9)</td>
        <td>8 (21.1)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>3rd year</td>
        <td>40 (76.9)</td>
        <td>12 (23.1)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>4th year</td>
        <td>35 (89.7)</td>
        <td>4 (10.3)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td colspan="5">Economic Status</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Good</td>
        <td>15 (83.3)</td>
        <td>3 (16.7)</td>
        <td rowspan="3">0.189</td>
        <td rowspan="3">0.91</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Average</td>
        <td>107 (79.9)</td>
        <td>27 (20.1)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Poor</td>
        <td>10 (83.3)</td>
        <td>2 (16.7)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td colspan="5">Marital status</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Single</td>
        <td>121 (80.1)</td>
        <td>30 (19.9)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.153</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.696</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Married</td>
        <td>11 (84.6)</td>
        <td>2 (15.4)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td colspan="5">Family History of Lung Cancer</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>7 (77.8)</td>
        <td>2 (22.2)</td>
        <td rowspan="3">0.322</td>
        <td rowspan="3">0.851</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Unknown</td>
        <td>17 (85)</td>
        <td>3 (15)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>108 (80)</td>
        <td>27 (20)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td colspan="5">Smoking History of participants</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>24 (75)</td>
        <td>8 (25)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.762</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.383</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>108 (81.8)</td>
        <td>24 (18.2)</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Notes: Data are presented as frequency (N) and percentage (%). The
association between demographic characteristics and participants’
awareness level was analyzed using the Chi-square test (χ²). A
<italic>P</italic>-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.</p>
<p><bold>Discussion</bold></p>
<p>The findings of this study indicated that the age range of
participants was 18-24 yr, which is consistent with other similar
studies (17, 19, 20). This similarity might be attributed to the study
population, as most of these studies focused on young individuals within
the same age range. In our findings, the majority of participants were
single (92.1%), which closely aligns with studies conducted in Saudi
Arabia (17, 19) and Malaysia (21). This similarity could be due to the
young population, particularly students and unmarried individuals, who
participated in these studies. Our findings showed that only 5.5% of the
participants reported a family history of lung cancer, while 82.3%
denied having such a history. This finding is closely aligned with a
study conducted in Saudi Arabia (22), where 3.7% of individuals reported
a family history of lung cancer. The slight difference could be
attributed to variations in family lifestyles and health habits among
the populations.</p>
<p>Our study revealed that 19.5% of participants had a history of
smoking, while 80.5% did not. This finding closely aligns with studies
conducted in Saudi Arabia (18, 19). These differences might be explained
by geographical location, economic conditions, and lifestyle differences
among the populations. This study showed that the majority of
participants had good awareness (80.49%), and only a few of them had
poor awareness (19.51%). Meanwhile, in two conducted studies (21, 23),
they demonstrated good awareness, whereas in three other studies
(24-26), they exhibited poor awareness. This suggests a potential
variability in awareness that could be influenced by national education
campaigns, cultural perceptions of cancer, and the accessibility of
accurate health information.</p>
<p>The present study demonstrated that 98.2% of participants identified
smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer. This finding aligns with
studies conducted in Malaysia (17) and Saudi Arabia (18). The similarity
might be due to public awareness about the negative effects of smoking,
particularly in urban areas. This study also showed that fried foods,
alcohol, and occupational exposure were identified as risk factors for
lung cancer, closely aligned with a study conducted in Malaysia (17).
This similarity might be attributed to similarities in lifestyle and
dietary habits among these populations. Our findings indicated that most
participants had a good level of awareness (80.5%), while only 19.5% had
poor awareness. These findings noticeably differ from studies conducted
in India (20), Saudi Arabia (19, 22), and Malaysia (21). This difference
might be due to variations in public education, access to health
information, and awareness programs in these regions.</p>
<p>Our findings revealed that the major symptoms of lung cancer among
participants were persistent cough (22.47%), shortness of breath
(31.72%), hemoptysis (22.91%), and weight loss (22.91%). When compared
with previous studies, these same symptoms have also been commonly
reported in the literature. Similar patterns were observed in studies
conducted in South Africa (27) and Saudi Arabia (18, 19), although the
reported percentages varied. These differences could be attributed to
disparities in lung cancer awareness and access to healthcare services
among populations.</p>
<p>The findings of this study contribute valuable insights into the
level of lung cancer awareness among young adults in Afghanistan, an
area where little research exists. The results can help guide awareness
campaigns, public health education programs, and university-level
interventions aimed at reducing risk factors and promoting early
detection. Specifically, by identifying key misconceptions and awareness
gaps, health authorities can develop targeted educational content for
young adults, which may lead to improved preventive behaviors and timely
healthcare-seeking. Given the growing burden of non-communicable
diseases in low- and middle-income countries, such localized data are
crucial for evidence-based policy-making.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Limitations</bold></italic></p>
<p>This study was conducted at the Public Health Faculty of Kabul
University of Medical Sciences in Afghanistan, which limits the
generalizability of the findings to the broader student population or
general public. Furthermore, due to existing socio-political challenges
and cultural barriers particularly restrictions on female education the
study encountered substantial difficulty in accessing female students
for questionnaire distribution. This limitation may have influenced the
results, as the perspectives and awareness levels of female students
could differ significantly from those of male participants.</p>
<p><bold>Conclusion</bold></p>
<p>This study highlights crucial gaps in students’ awareness of lung
cancer, particularly concerning less recognized risk factors and
symptoms. While general knowledge about well-known risks such as smoking
was high, the limited understanding of occupational exposures and
dietary influences indicates areas where public health education remains
insufficient. These gaps may hinder early detection and prevention
efforts. The uniformity of awareness across different demographic groups
suggests that future awareness campaigns should adopt a universal
design, rather than targeting specific subgroups. Moreover, the lack of
differentiation in awareness between smokers and non-smokers underscores
the need for comprehensive, inclusive educational strategies. These
findings underscore the urgent need for structured and accessible
awareness programs within educational institutions. Such initiatives
should aim not only to improve awareness but also to promote proactive
health behaviors. Future research could explore the long-term
effectiveness of these programs, their adaptability to different student
populations, and their potential role in reducing lung cancer
incidence.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Data availability</bold></italic></p>
<p>The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions and
anonymity but can be obtained upon request from the corresponding author
at (<email>bashirqudrati786@gmail.com</email>).</p>
<p><italic><bold>Funding</bold></italic></p>
<p>This research was conducted without any financial support from
external sources.</p>
<p><bold>Conflict of interest</bold></p>
<p>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.</p>
<p><bold>References</bold></p>
<list list-type="order">
  <list-item>
    <p>Ferlay J EM, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global
    cancer observatory: Cancer today. 2020;2024</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M,
    Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview.
    Int J Cancer. 2021;149:778-789.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A.
    Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and
    mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J
    Clin. 2018;68:394-424.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Sobin LH. Cancer in afghanistan. Cancer. 1969;23:678-688.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Bloomfeld RS, Bridgers DI, Pineau BC. Sensitivity of upper
    endoscopy in diagnosing esophageal cancer. Dysphagia.
    2005;20:278-282.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Ezzati M, Riboli E. Can noncommunicable diseases be prevented?
    Lessons from studies of populations and individuals. Science.
    2012;337:1482-1487.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Daniels M, Donilon T, Bollyky TJ. The emerging global health
    crisis: Noncommunicable diseases in low-and middle-income countries.
    Council on Foreign Relations independent task force report. 2014</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Sherman SM, Lane EL. Awareness of risk factors for breast, lung
    and cervical cancer in a uk student population. J Cancer Educ.
    2015;30:660-663.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Thun MJ, Henley SJ, Calle EE. Tobacco use and cancer: An
    epidemiologic perspective for geneticists. Oncogene.
    2002;21:7307-7325.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Pesch B, Kendzia B, Gustavsson P, Jöckel KH, Johnen G, et al.
    Cigarette smoking and lung cancer—relative risk estimates for the
    major histological types from a pooled analysis of case–control
    studies. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:1210-1219.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Seki T, Nishino Y, Tanji F, Maemondo M, Takahashi S, Sato I, et
    al. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer risk according to histologic
    type in japanese men and women. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:1515-1522.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Bouchardy C, Benhamou S, Jourenkova N, Dayer P, Hirvonen A.
    Metabolic genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to lung cancer.
    Lung Cancer. 2001;32:109-112.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Crane M, Scott N, O’Hara BJ, Aranda S, Lafontaine M, Stacey I, et
    al. Knowledge of the signs and symptoms and risk factors of lung
    cancer in australia: Mixed methods study. BMC Public Health.
    2016;16:1-12.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Smith SM, Campbell NC, MacLeod U, Lee AJ, Raja A, Wyke S, et al.
    Factors contributing to the time taken to consult with symptoms of
    lung cancer: A cross-sectional study. Thorax. 2009;64:523-531.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Athey VL, Suckling RJ, Tod AM, Walters SJ, Rogers TK. Early
    diagnosis of lung cancer: Evaluation of a community-based social
    marketing intervention. Thorax. 2012;67:412-417.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>WORLDHEALTHRANKINGS. Afghanistan: Lung cancers rankings in the
    world. 2020;2024</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Al-Naggar RA. Knowledge and practice towards lung cancer among
    university students. J Community Med Health Edu. 2012;2:2.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Madkhali MA, Alhazmi E, Hakami F, Darraj H, Hamdi S, Hakami KM,
    et al. A cross-sectional study on the knowledge and awareness of
    lung cancer and screening in jazan region, saudi arabia. Journal of
    Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2023:3857-3870.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Qadhi OA, Alghamdi A, Alshael D, Alanazi MF, Syed W, Alsulaihim
    IN, Al-Rawi MBA. Knowledge and awareness of warning signs about lung
    cancer among pharmacy and nursing undergraduates in riyadh, saudi
    arabia-an observational study. J Cancer. 2023;14:3378.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Jeppu AK, Jailani NABM, Kumar KA. Knowledge about lung cancer and
    awareness of its risk factors among the university students.
    Executive Editor. 2019;10:633.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Zainuddin N, Thabit H. Knowledge and perception on lung cancer
    and its screening: A study among undergraduate students of the
    international islamic university malaysia, kuantan campus. J Biomed
    Clin Sci. 2018;2:61-67.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Alhalafi AH, Eltahir HB, Almalki SM, Alghuthaymi AM, Almaawi AM,
    Hajlaa AM, Alshamrani AA, Alghamdi FA, Almuawi KF, Alharthi KZ.
    Awareness of lung cancer and its risk factors among population of
    bisha region. Int J Commun Med Public Health. 2023;10:1693.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Al-Naggar RA, Kadir SYA. Lung cancer knowledge among secondary
    school male teachers in kudat, sabah, malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer
    Prev. 2013;14:103-109.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Desalu O, Fawibe A, Sanya E, Ojuawo O, Aladesanmi A, Salami A.
    Lung cancer awareness and anticipated delay before seeking medical
    help in the middle-belt population of nigeria. Int J Tubercul Lung
    Dis. 2016;20:560-566.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Loh JF, Tan SL. Lung cancer knowledge and screening in the
    context of the malaysian population. J Pharmacy Practice Res.
    2018;48:56-64.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Shankar A, Roy S, Malik A, Rath G, Julka P, Kamal VK, Barnwal K,
    Upadhyaya S, Singh R, Srivastava V. Level of awareness of various
    aspects of lung cancer among college teachers in india: Impact of
    cancer awareness programmes in prevention and early detection. J
    Cancer Educ. 2016;31:709-714.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Dlamini S, Sartorius B, Ginindza T. Knowledge, attitudes and
    practices towards lung cancer among adults in kwazulu-natal, south
    africa: A cross-sectional survey. J Public Health Afr.
    2022;13:2111.</p>
  </list-item>
</list>
</body>
<back>
</back>
</article>
