<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.2 20190208//EN"
                  "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.2" article-type="other">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id></journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
</journal-title-group>
<issn></issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<permissions>
</permissions>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p><bold>Prevalence and Risk Factors of <italic>Giardia
intestinalis</italic> Infection among Patients in Laghman and Nangarhar
Provinces in Eastern Afghanistan</bold></p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="18%" />
      <col width="62%" />
      <col width="20%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><inline-graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" xlink:href="vertopal_326041adfbc940fd93d8c9566e32da54/media/image1.jpeg" />ajbms.knu.edu.af</th>
        <th><p><bold>Afghanistan Journal of Basic Medical
        Sciences</bold></p>
        <p>2025 Jan 2(2): 206-221.</p></th>
        <th><graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png" xlink:href="vertopal_326041adfbc940fd93d8c9566e32da54/media/image2.png" />
        <p>ISSN: 3005-6632</p></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Ebadullah Arabzai, Raihanullah Sahibzada, *Hadia Azami, Mohammad
Esmail Ahmadyar</p>
<disp-quote>
  <p><italic>Medical Sciences Research Center, Ghalib University, Kabul,
  Afghanistan</italic></p>
</disp-quote>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="28%" />
      <col width="72%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>A R ART I C L E I N F O</bold></th>
        <th><bold>A B S T R A C T</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td><p><bold>Type: Original Article</bold></p>
        <p>Received: 01 June 2025</p>
        <p>Accepted: 5 July 2025</p>
        <p>*Corresponding Author:</p>
        <p>E-mails: dr.hadia.azami@gmail.com</p>
        <p><bold>To cite this article:</bold> Arabzai E, Sahibzada R,
        Azami H, Ahmadyar ME. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Giardia
        intestinalis Infection among Patients in Laghman and Nangarhar
        Provinces in Eastern Afghanistan.</p>
        <p>Afghanistan Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 2025 Jan
        2(2):206-221.</p>
        <p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.62134/khatamuni.97">https://doi.org/10.62134/khatamuni.97</ext-link></p></td>
        <td><p><bold>Background:</bold> <italic>Giardia
        intestinalis,</italic> a gastrointestinal protozoan parasite, is
        a significant cause of diarrhea and abdominal discomfort,
        particularly in developing countries. We aimed to determine the
        prevalence and risk factors associated with <italic>G.
        intestinalis</italic> in Laghman and Nangarhar provinces in
        Eastern Afghanistan from January to December 2023.</p>
        <p><bold>Methods:</bold> A cross-sectional study was conducted
        among 1,351 patients with gastrointestinal symptoms, including
        604 from Laghman and 747 from Nangarhar provinces, Afghanistan.
        Stool samples were collected from each participant using sterile
        containers and subsequently analyzed under light microscopy to
        identify the presence of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> cysts
        or trophozoites. Individuals who tested positive for <italic>G.
        intestinalis</italic> were identified as cases. An equal number
        of <italic>Giardia</italic>-negative individuals were selected
        randomly as controls for risk factor analysis. All participants
        identified as <italic>Giardia</italic>-positive completed a
        structured questionnaire to collect data on demographic,
        socioeconomic, environmental, behavioral, seasonal, and clinical
        factors. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine
        significant risk factors.</p>
        <p><bold>Results:</bold> Overall, 124 samples (9.2%) tested
        positive for <italic>G. intestinalis</italic>, with positivity
        rates of 7.5% in Laghman and 10.6% in Nangarhar. In Laghman,
        male sex, domestic animal ownership, soil contact, swimming in
        unregulated water bodies, and consumption of unfiltered water
        were significantly associated with infection
        (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). In Nangarhar, female sex and
        higher monthly income were identified as significant risk
        factors. The most commonly reported symptoms among positive
        cases were abdominal pain and diarrhea. Children aged 5-14
        exhibited the highest positivity rates.</p>
        <p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The findings indicate a notable
        prevalence of giardiasis among symptomatic patients in Laghman
        and Nangarhar, with a higher burden in Nangarhar. Various
        demographic, socioeconomic, environmental, and behavioral
        factors were identified as significant contributors to infection
        risk.</p>
        <p><bold>Keywords:</bold> Giardiasis, <italic>Giardia
        intestinalis</italic>, Middle East, Parasite, Parasitology,
        Prevalence, Public health, Risk factors.</p></td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><bold>Introduction</bold></p>
<p>Gastrointestinal parasite (GP) infections represent a significant
global health burden, particularly in underprivileged communities within
tropical and subtropical regions (1). Among these infections is
giardiasis, caused by <italic>Giardia intestinalis</italic> (also
referred to as <italic>G. lamblia</italic> or <italic>G.
duodenalis</italic>), a flagellated protozoan that infects around 180
million individuals annually (2, 3). The infection is primarily
transmitted through the fecal-oral route by ingesting water, food, or
vegetables contaminated with <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> cysts,
making it more common in developing countries due to inadequate
sanitation, limited access to healthcare facilities, and poor-quality
drinking water (4).</p>
<p>Individuals infected with <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> may be
asymptomatic carriers or experience acute symptoms such as diarrhea,
abdominal discomfort, nausea, and vomiting. If left untreated, the
infection can become chronic, leading to malabsorption, which may result
in nutrient deficiencies, anemia, growth retardation, and weight loss
(5, 6). Post-infectious complications of giardiasis include irritable
bowel syndrome (7), chronic fatigue syndrome (8), arthritis, allergies,
cognitive impairment, and other extra-intestinal conditions (9).</p>
<p>While giardiasis is reported globally, it is notably more prevalent
in developing countries, with positivity rates ranging from 20% to 30%,
compared with rates of 2% to 5% in developed countries (10). A
systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the prevalence of
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic> among African children and estimated a
pooled prevalence of 18.3%, with the highest and lowest rates in Niger
and Cameroon, respectively (11). In a similar study focusing on Asian
children, Kalavani et al. reported a pooled prevalence of 15.1%, with
the highest rates in Tajikistan and Malaysia and the lowest in China and
Saudi Arabia (4).</p>
<p>In Afghanistan, the pooled prevalence of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> is 13.92%, and the reported prevalence varies
considerably across regions and population groups (Table 1).</p>
<p>Among children, positivity rates range from 5.1% to 31.1% (12-18),
while in adults, rates range from 2.7% to 10.1% by light microscopy,
with up to 18.1% detected by antigen-ELISA testing (15, 18, 19). Among
symptomatic individuals, positivity rates range from 5.1% to 17.2% (15,
17, 18, 20, 21). A study of asymptomatic Polish soldiers at the Forward
Operating Base Ghazni revealed 2.7% prevalence by light microscopy and
18.1% by ELISA (19). Although males generally exhibit higher positivity
rates, one study in Parwan found that adult females had a higher
prevalence (15, 18, 20, 21). These findings underscore the variability
in <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> prevalence, influenced by age, sex,
and diagnostic methods.</p>
<p>Giardiasis remains a significant health concern among Afghan refugees
and travelers to endemic regions. A study in the Mianwali district of
Pakistan among Afghan refugees reported a 7.7% positivity rate (22),
while Heravi et al. found an 8.8% prevalence among Afghan children in
Kashan City, Iran (23). Higher prevalence rates were observed in Afghan
refugees in camps in Pakistan before relocation to Sweden (24), and
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic> was the most common infectious disease
among newly arrived Afghan refugees in rural Australia (25). 10.3%
prevalence was reported in children and 11.6% in adolescents among
Afghan refugees resettled in Calgary, Canada (26).</p>
<p></p>
<p><bold>Table 1:</bold> Prevalence of Giardiasis in Afghanistan and
Among Afghan Refugee Populations</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="7%" />
      <col width="8%" />
      <col width="8%" />
      <col width="8%" />
      <col width="11%" />
      <col width="12%" />
      <col width="10%" />
      <col width="13%" />
      <col width="9%" />
      <col width="14%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Ref. no.</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Author(s)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Study Period</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Year of Publication</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Province/Country</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Sample Demographics</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Symptomatic/Asymptomatic</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Diagnostic Method</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Sample Size (N)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Prevalence (%) of G. intestinalis</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>(20)</td>
        <td>Asad et al.</td>
        <td>Jan – Dec 2023</td>
        <td>2024</td>
        <td>Wardak, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>General population</td>
        <td>Symptomatic</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>274</td>
        <td>6.9%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(13)</td>
        <td>Rahimi et al.</td>
        <td>May – Dec 2022</td>
        <td>2023</td>
        <td>Kandahar, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>Primary School Children</td>
        <td>No relevant data</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>1,275</td>
        <td>22.4%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(21)</td>
        <td>Nekmal and Jan</td>
        <td>Mar – Aug 2022</td>
        <td>2023</td>
        <td>Khost, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>General Population</td>
        <td>Symptomatic</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>368</td>
        <td>9.2%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(12)</td>
        <td>Rahimi et al.</td>
        <td>June – Oct 2020</td>
        <td>2022</td>
        <td>Kandahar, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>Children</td>
        <td>No relevant data</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>1,426</td>
        <td>13.9%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(14)</td>
        <td>Lass et. al</td>
        <td>Nov 2013 – April 2014</td>
        <td>2017</td>
        <td>Ghazni, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>Children aged
        7 – 18</td>
        <td>No relevant data</td>
        <td>Real-time PCR</td>
        <td>245</td>
        <td>21.2%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td rowspan="2">(15)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">Korzeniewski et al.</td>
        <td>Mar – Apr 2013</td>
        <td rowspan="2">2017</td>
        <td>Ghazni, Afghanistan</td>
        <td rowspan="2">General Population</td>
        <td rowspan="2">Symptomatic</td>
        <td rowspan="2">Light microscopy</td>
        <td>386 (179 children; 207 adults)</td>
        <td>14.5% Children; 7.2% Adults</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Oct – Nov 2014</td>
        <td>Parwan, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>162 (93 children; 69 adults)</td>
        <td>17.2% Children; 10.1% Adults</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(16)</td>
        <td>Korzeniewski et al.</td>
        <td>Nov 2013 – April 2014</td>
        <td>2016</td>
        <td>Ghazni, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>Children aged
        7 - 18</td>
        <td>No relevant data</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>500</td>
        <td>31.1%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(19)</td>
        <td>Korzeniewski et al.</td>
        <td>Aug 2011</td>
        <td>2016</td>
        <td>Ghazni, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>Polish Soldiers (aged 22 – 48)</td>
        <td>Asymptomatic</td>
        <td>Light microscopy; RIDA Quick <italic>Giardia</italic> IC
        test; RIDA screen <italic>Giardia</italic> IE test</td>
        <td>630</td>
        <td>2.7% (by microscopy); 18.1% (by ELISA)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(17)</td>
        <td>Elyan et al.</td>
        <td>2009 - 2010</td>
        <td>2014</td>
        <td>Kabul &amp; Kandahar, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>Children &lt; 5</td>
        <td>Symptomatic</td>
        <td>ELISA</td>
        <td>699</td>
        <td><p>5.1% (single infection)</p>
        <p>12.1 % (single and mixed infection)</p></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(18)</td>
        <td>Tariq</td>
        <td>Jan 2008 – June 2012</td>
        <td>2013</td>
        <td>Kabul, Afghanistan</td>
        <td>General Population</td>
        <td>Symptomatic</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>20,040</td>
        <td>9.0%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(26)</td>
        <td>Smathi et al.</td>
        <td>Jan 2011 – Dec 2020</td>
        <td>2024</td>
        <td>Calgary, Canada</td>
        <td>Newly Resettled Afghan Refugees</td>
        <td>Symptomatic</td>
        <td>Laboratory methods (unspecified)</td>
        <td>402</td>
        <td>10.3% in children; 11.6% in adults</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(22)</td>
        <td>Haq et al.</td>
        <td>Feb 2007 – Dec 2009</td>
        <td>2015</td>
        <td>Mianwali, Pakistan</td>
        <td>Afghan refugees</td>
        <td>Symptomatic</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>687</td>
        <td>37.7%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(23)</td>
        <td>Heravi et al.</td>
        <td>2009 - 2010</td>
        <td>2013</td>
        <td>Kashan, Iran</td>
        <td>Afghan Children in Primary and Junior High Schools</td>
        <td>No relevant data</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>430</td>
        <td>8.8%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(25)</td>
        <td>Sanati et al.</td>
        <td>April 2010 – March 2013</td>
        <td>2014</td>
        <td>Mildura Victoria, Australia</td>
        <td>Afghan Refugees</td>
        <td>No relevant data</td>
        <td>Light microscopy</td>
        <td>92</td>
        <td>11.2%</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>(24)</td>
        <td>Ekdahl and Andersson</td>
        <td>1997 - 2003</td>
        <td>2005</td>
        <td>Sweden</td>
        <td>International travelers, immigrants/refugees, and adopted
        children</td>
        <td>No relevant data</td>
        <td>Laboratory methods (unspecified)</td>
        <td>Not applicable</td>
        <td>3.8% (Afghan refugees)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td colspan="10">CS = cross-sectional; IC =
        Immunochromatographic; IE = Immunoenzymatic; OS = Observational
        Study; RCS = retrospective cohort study</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The differing prevalence of giardiasis across various countries and
regions highlights the necessity for more in-depth research. Afghanistan
has 34 provinces, but the studies conducted have been limited to only a
few provinces: Kabul, Kandahar, Khost, Wardak, Parwan, and Ghazni
(12-16, 20, 21).</p>
<p>We aimed to address this gap by estimating the prevalence of
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic> by collecting data on positivity rates
and identifying its associated risk factors in the provinces of Laghman
and Nangarhar in Eastern Afghanistan.</p>
<p><bold>Materials and Methods</bold></p>
<p><italic><bold>Study area, population, and sample
collection</bold></italic></p>
<p>This study was conducted from January to December 2023 in the eastern
Afghan provinces of Laghman and Nangarhar, which cover approximately
2,790 and 3,060 square miles, respectively ((1), 28). According to the
National Statistics and Information Authority (NSIA), the estimated
populations in 2023 were 519,842 for Laghman and 1,805,087 for
Nangarhar, with approximately equal sex distributions in both provinces.
Children aged 0–14 comprised 52% of the population in Laghman and 51% in
Nangarhar, and most residents in both provinces live in rural areas
(29).</p>
<p>We conducted a cross-sectional study among 1,351 individuals (604
from Laghman and 747 from Nangarhar) enrolled passively as they
presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. Stool samples were collected
using sterile, labeled containers and microscopically examined for the
presence of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic>. Individuals with confirmed
infections were identified as cases, and an equal number of control
participants were randomly selected from among the Giardia-negative
individuals.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Questionnaire</bold></italic></p>
<p>In addition to stool sample testing, participants completed a
structured questionnaire to collect data on potential risk factors.
Demographic variables included age (categorized into five groups) and
sex. Socioeconomic status included monthly household income, classified
as low (&lt;AFN 10,000), middle (AFN 10,000–20,000), and high (&gt;AFN
20,000) based on the national income averages in Afghanistan. Clinical
symptoms recorded included diarrhea (defined as the passage of three or
more loose stools in 24 h) (30), as well as nausea, vomiting, abdominal
pain, weakness, headache, and fever. Environmental factors encompassed
domestic animal ownership, soil contact, and types of drinking water.
Behavioral factors included recent travel history and swimming in
unregulated water bodies. Lastly, we included temporal factors to assess
which season had the most onsets of symptoms.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Statistical analysis</bold></italic></p>
<p>Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 26 (IBM Corp.,
Armonk, NY, USA). Separate analyses were conducted for each province to
identify associated risk factors, followed by comparative analyses
between Laghman and Nangarhar. Logistic regression was applied to
determine whether age and sex were independently associated with
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic> positivity. The model adjusted for
these variables to account for potential confounding effects. A
<italic>P</italic>-value&lt;0.05 was considered statistically
significant.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Ethical considerations</bold></italic></p>
<p>The Biomedical Ethics Committee of Ghalib University, Kabul,
Afghanistan (AF.GUK.REC.1401.008) reviewed and approved the study
protocol. Each participant provided informed written or oral (if
illiterate) consent, covering participation in the physical examination
and completing the questionnaires. For child participants, written
consent was obtained from a parent or legal guardian. To protect
privacy, all data were anonymized using unique participation codes and
handled with strict confidentiality throughout the study.</p>
<p><bold>Results</bold></p>
<p><italic><bold>Positivity rates of G. intestinalis in Laghman and
Nangarhar provinces</bold></italic></p>
<p>Overall, 1351 stool samples were collected: 604 from Laghman (311
males [51.5%], 293 females [48.5%]) and 747 from Nangarhar (436 males
[58.3%], 311 females [41.6%]). Overall, 124 samples tested positive for
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic>: 45 (7.5%) in Laghman and 79 (10.6%) in
Nangarhar.</p>
<p><italic><bold>G. intestinalis and associated risk factors in
Laghman</bold></italic></p>
<p>The distribution of positive cases across age groups and sex in
Laghman, as shown in (Figure 1), indicated higher positivity rates among
children aged 5 to 14. Males exhibited higher positivity rates than
females across most age groups, as confirmed by chi-square analysis
(<italic>P</italic>=0.032). Logistic regression analysis further
confirmed that sex remained a significant predictor of positivity
(<italic>P</italic>=0.02), while age showed no significant effect
(<italic>P</italic>=0.564).</p>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="vertopal_326041adfbc940fd93d8c9566e32da54/media/image4.tiff" />
<p><bold>Figure 1:</bold> Distribution of G. intestinalis positive cases
across age groups, stratified by sex, in Laghman province. The number of
positive samples is shown as bars (blue for females, red for males),
while the total number of individuals tested per group is represented by
lines. Positivity was higher among children aged 5–14 yr compared to
other age groups. Males had a significantly higher infection rate than
females (<italic>P</italic>=0.032). Logistic regression analysis
confirmed sex as a significant predictor of infection (P = 0.02),
whereas age group was not statistically significant
(<italic>P</italic>=0.564).</p>
<p>Several environmental and behavioral factors were significantly
associated with <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> infection in Laghman
(Table 2), including domestic animal ownership
(<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001), consumption of unfiltered water
(<italic>P</italic>=0.001), soil contact (<italic>P</italic>=0.042), and
swimming in unregulated water bodies (<italic>P</italic>=0.017).
Infections peaked during autumn (<italic>P</italic>=0.016), followed by
summer, spring, and winter (Table 3).</p>
<p>There were no significant associations with travel history or
socioeconomic status; however, lower-income individuals tended to show
higher positivity, though this trend was not statistically
significant.</p>
<p><bold>Table 2:</bold> Distribution of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> in Laghman in relation to demographic,
socioeconomic, environmental, and behavioral factors</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="30%" />
      <col width="23%" />
      <col width="20%" />
      <col width="1%" />
      <col width="11%" />
      <col width="15%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Risk Factors</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Case (N = 45)
        n (%)</bold></th>
        <th colspan="2"><bold>Controls (N = 45)
        n (%)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>χ<sup>2</sup></bold></th>
        <th><bold>P-value</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Socioeconomic</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Monthly income</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>&lt;10,000 AFN</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>26 (57.8)</td>
        <td>24 (53.3)</td>
        <td rowspan="3" colspan="2">1.080</td>
        <td rowspan="3">0.583</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>10,000 – 20,000 AFN</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>14 (31.1)</td>
        <td>18 (40.0)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>&gt;20,000 AFN</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>5 (11.1)</td>
        <td>3 (6.7)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Environmental and Behavioral Factors</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Domestic animal ownership</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>36 (80.0)</td>
        <td>4 (8.9)</td>
        <td rowspan="2" colspan="2">46.080</td>
        <td rowspan="2">&lt; 0.0001</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>9(20.0)</td>
        <td>41(91.1)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Source of drinking water</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Hand pump water</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>38(84.4)</td>
        <td>24(53.3)</td>
        <td rowspan="2" colspan="2">10.161</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.001</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Filtered water</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>7(15.6)</td>
        <td>21(46.7)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Contact with soil</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>35 (77.8)</td>
        <td>26 (57.8)</td>
        <td rowspan="2" colspan="2">4.121</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.042</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>10 (22.2)</td>
        <td>19 (42.2)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Swimming in unregulated water bodies</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>23(51.1)</td>
        <td>12(26.7)</td>
        <td rowspan="2" colspan="2">5.657</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.017</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>22(48.9)</td>
        <td>33(73.3)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Travel history</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td colspan="2"></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>10(22.2)</td>
        <td>6(13.6)</td>
        <td rowspan="2" colspan="2">1.112</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.292</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>35(77.8)</td>
        <td>38(86.4)</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><bold>Table 3:</bold> Distribution of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> in Laghman in relation to Season (One sample
Chi-square Test)</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="19%" />
      <col width="15%" />
      <col width="17%" />
      <col width="17%" />
      <col width="15%" />
      <col width="17%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Season</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Observed N</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Expected N</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Residual</bold></th>
        <th><bold>X<sup>2</sup></bold></th>
        <th><bold>P-value</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Spring</td>
        <td>7</td>
        <td>11.3</td>
        <td>- 4.3</td>
        <td rowspan="4">10.387</td>
        <td rowspan="4">0.016</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Summer</td>
        <td>15</td>
        <td>11.3</td>
        <td>3.8</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Fall</td>
        <td>18</td>
        <td>11.3</td>
        <td>6.8</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Winter</td>
        <td>5</td>
        <td>11.3</td>
        <td>- 6.3</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><italic><bold>G. intestinalis and associated risk factors in
Nangarhar</bold></italic></p>
<p>The distribution of positive cases across age and sex in Nangarhar,
shown in Figure 2, reveals higher positivity rates among children aged 5
to 14.</p>
<p>Females had higher positivity rates than males across most age
groups, a disparity that remained significant according to chi-square
analysis and after adjusting for age (<italic>P</italic>=0.002). Older
age was associated with a lower likelihood of testing positive
(<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.001).</p>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="vertopal_326041adfbc940fd93d8c9566e32da54/media/image5.tiff" />
<p><bold>Figure 2:</bold> Distribution of positive cases across
different age groups, stratified by sex, in Nangarhar. The number of
positive samples is shown as bars (blue for females, red for males),
while the total number of individuals tested per group is represented by
lines. Positivity was higher among children aged 5–14 yr compared to
other age groups. Females exhibited a significantly higher positivity
rate compared to males, which remained significant after adjusting for
age (<italic>P</italic>=0.002). Age influenced positivity, with older
individuals being less likely to test positive
(<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.001).</p>
<p>Monthly income was significantly associated with infection
(<italic>P</italic>=0.018), with the highest rates observed among
participants from high-income families (</p>
<p>Table <bold>4</bold>). Seasonal variation was also significant
(<italic>P</italic>=0.045), with infections peaking in summer (Table
5).</p>
<p>Environmental and behavioral factors, such as domestic animal
ownership, source of drinking water, soil contact, swimming in
unregulated water bodies, and travel history, were not statistically
significant. However, those who owned domestic animals or consumed
unfiltered water showed higher positivity rates.</p>
<p><italic><bold>Comparative analysis of G. intestinalis risk factors in
Laghman and Nangarhar</bold></italic></p>
<p>The comparative analysis of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> risk
factors between Laghman and Nangarhar revealed regional disparities in
risk factors (Correlation between <italic><bold>G. intestinalis
infection and clinical symptoms</bold></italic></p>
<p>As shown in Table 7, the most common symptoms among positive cases
were abdominal pain (83.9%) and diarrhea (60.5%), with watery (51.6%)
and bloody (9.7%) forms. Other frequent symptoms included fever (59.7%),
nausea (58.9%), weakness (31.5%), vomiting (25%), and headache
(24.2%).</p>
<p><bold>Table 6</bold>). Sex distribution was similar in both
provinces, but males in Laghman had significantly higher positivity
rates than those in Nangarhar (<italic>P</italic>=0.002). Participants
in Nangarhar reported significantly higher monthly incomes than those in
Laghman (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001).</p>
<p>Environmental and behavioral factors also differed significantly.
Swimming in unregulated water bodies (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001),
domestic animal ownership (<italic>P</italic>=0.001), and soil contact
(<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001) were all more common in Laghman and
significantly associated with <italic>G. intestinalis</italic>
infection. In contrast, travel history (<italic>P</italic>=0.536) and
source of drinking water (<italic>P</italic>=0.12) showed no significant
association with positivity.</p>
<p></p>
<p><bold>Table 4:</bold> Distribution of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> in Nangarhar in relation to demographic,
socioeconomic, environmental, and behavioral factors</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="29%" />
      <col width="26%" />
      <col width="26%" />
      <col width="8%" />
      <col width="10%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Risk Factors</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Case (N = 79)
        n (%)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Controls (N = 79)
        n (%)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>X<sup>2</sup></bold></th>
        <th><bold>P-value</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Socioeconomic Factors</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Monthly income</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>&lt;10,000 AFN</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>12 (85.7)</td>
        <td>2 (14.3)</td>
        <td rowspan="3">7.991</td>
        <td rowspan="3">0.018</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>10,000 – 20,000 AFN</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>30 (44.8)</td>
        <td>37 (55.2)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>&gt;20,000 AFN</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>37 (48.1)</td>
        <td>40 (51.9)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Environmental and Behavioral Factors</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Domestic Animals</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>39 (54.2)</td>
        <td>33 (45.8)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">1.418</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.234</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>37 (44.6)</td>
        <td>46 (55.4)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Source of drinking Water</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Hand pump water</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>57 (51.8)</td>
        <td>53 (48.2)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.472</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.604</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Filtered water</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>22 (45.8)</td>
        <td>26 (54.2)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Contact with soil</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>34 (52.3)</td>
        <td>31 (47.7)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.235</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.628</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>45 (48.4)</td>
        <td>48 (51.6)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Swimming in unregulated water bodies</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>14 (48.3)</td>
        <td>15 (51.7)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.042</td>
        <td rowspan="2">1</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>65 (50.4)</td>
        <td>64 (49.6)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Travel history</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>Yes</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>21 (46.7)</td>
        <td>24 (53.3)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.183</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.668</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><p specific-use="wrapper">
          <disp-quote>
            <p>No</p>
          </disp-quote>
        </p></td>
        <td>56 (50.5)</td>
        <td>55 (49.5)</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><bold>Table 5:</bold> Distribution of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> in Nangarhar in relation to Season (One sample
Chi-square Test)</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="14%" />
      <col width="23%" />
      <col width="22%" />
      <col width="16%" />
      <col width="13%" />
      <col width="13%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Seasons</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Observed Numbers</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Expected Numbers</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Residual</bold></th>
        <th><disp-formula><alternatives>
        <tex-math><![CDATA[\mathbf{\chi}^{\mathbf{2}}]]></tex-math>
        <mml:math display="block" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mstyle mathvariant="bold"><mml:mi>𝛘</mml:mi></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle mathvariant="bold"><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mstyle></mml:msup></mml:math></alternatives></disp-formula></th>
        <th><bold>P-value</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Spring</td>
        <td>19</td>
        <td>19.8</td>
        <td>- 0.8</td>
        <td rowspan="4">8.038</td>
        <td rowspan="4">0.045</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Summer</td>
        <td>30</td>
        <td>19.8</td>
        <td>10.3</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Fall</td>
        <td>17</td>
        <td>19.8</td>
        <td>- 2.8</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Winter</td>
        <td>13</td>
        <td>19.8</td>
        <td>- 6.8</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><italic><bold>Correlation between G. intestinalis infection and
clinical symptoms</bold></italic></p>
<p>As shown in Table 7, the most common symptoms among positive cases
were abdominal pain (83.9%) and diarrhea (60.5%), with watery (51.6%)
and bloody (9.7%) forms. Other frequent symptoms included fever (59.7%),
nausea (58.9%), weakness (31.5%), vomiting (25%), and headache
(24.2%).</p>
<p><bold>Table 6:</bold> Comparative Analysis of associated risk factors
of G. intestinalis between Laghman and Nangarhar</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="24%" />
      <col width="21%" />
      <col width="27%" />
      <col width="13%" />
      <col width="15%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Characteristics</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Laghman (n = 45),
        n (%)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>Nangarhar (n = 79),
        n (%)</bold></th>
        <th><bold>X<sup>2</sup></bold></th>
        <th><bold>P-value</bold></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Sex</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Male</td>
        <td>31 (68.9)</td>
        <td>32 (40.5)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">9.24</td>
        <td rowspan="2">0.002</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Female</td>
        <td>14 (31.1)</td>
        <td>47 (59.5)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Monthly income (AFN)</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>&lt; 10,000</td>
        <td>50 (55.6)</td>
        <td>12 (15.2)</td>
        <td rowspan="3">41.504</td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>10,000 – 20,000</td>
        <td>32 (35.6)</td>
        <td>30 (38.0)</td>
        <td>&lt; 0.0001</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>&gt; 20,000</td>
        <td>8 (8.9)</td>
        <td>37 (46.8)</td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Swimming in unregulated water bodies</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>23 (51.1)</td>
        <td>14 (17.7)</td>
        <td rowspan="2">15.267</td>
        <td rowspan="2">&lt; 0.0001</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>22 (48.9)</td>
        <td>65 (62.3)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Domestic animals</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>36 (80.0)</td>
        <td>39 (50.6)</td>
        <td>10.331</td>
        <td>0.001</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>9 (20.0)</td>
        <td>38 (49.4)</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Source of drinking water</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Hand-pump Water</td>
        <td>38 (84.4)</td>
        <td>57 (72.2)</td>
        <td>2.418</td>
        <td>0.12</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Filtered Water</td>
        <td>7 (15.6)</td>
        <td>22 (27.8)</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Contact with soil</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>35 (77.8)</td>
        <td>34 (43.0)</td>
        <td>14.019</td>
        <td>&lt;0.0001</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>10 (22.2)</td>
        <td>45 (57.0)</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Travel history</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>10 (22.2)</td>
        <td>21 (27.3)</td>
        <td>0.382</td>
        <td>0.536</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>35 (77.8)</td>
        <td>56 (72.3)</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Season</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Spring</td>
        <td>7 (15.6)</td>
        <td>19 (24.1)</td>
        <td rowspan="4">5.190</td>
        <td rowspan="4">0.158</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Summer</td>
        <td>15 (33.3)</td>
        <td>30 (38.0)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Autumn</td>
        <td>18 (40.0)</td>
        <td>17 (21.5)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Winter</td>
        <td>5 (11.1)</td>
        <td>13 (16.5)</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><bold>Table 7:</bold> Distribution of positive cases of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> on the basis of clinical symptoms</p>
<table-wrap>
  <table>
    <colgroup>
      <col width="27%" />
      <col width="21%" />
      <col width="26%" />
      <col width="26%" />
    </colgroup>
    <thead>
      <tr>
        <th><bold>Symptoms</bold></th>
        <th><p><bold>Laghman (n = 45)</bold></p>
        <p><bold>n (%)</bold></p></th>
        <th><p><bold>Nangarhar (n = 79)</bold></p>
        <p><bold>n (%)</bold></p></th>
        <th><p><bold>Total (N = 124)</bold></p>
        <p><bold>N (%)</bold></p></th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Abdominal pain</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>37 (82.2)</td>
        <td>67 (84.8)</td>
        <td>104 (83.9)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>8 (17.8)</td>
        <td>12 (15.2)</td>
        <td>20 (16.1)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Diarrhea</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>35 (79.5)</td>
        <td>40 (50.6)</td>
        <td>75 (60.5)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>9 (20.5)</td>
        <td>39 (49.4)</td>
        <td>48 (38.7)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Type of diarrhea</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Watery</td>
        <td>26 (86.7)</td>
        <td>38 (82.6)</td>
        <td>64 (51.6)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Bloody</td>
        <td>4 (13.3)</td>
        <td>8 (17.4)</td>
        <td>12 (9.7)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Fever</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>25 (55.6)</td>
        <td>49 (62.0)</td>
        <td>74 (59.7)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>20 (44.4)</td>
        <td>30 (38.0)</td>
        <td>50 (40.3)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Nausea</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>24 (53.3)</td>
        <td>49 (62.0)</td>
        <td>73 (58.9)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>21 (46.7)</td>
        <td>30 (38.0)</td>
        <td>51 (41.1)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Weakness</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>14 (31.1)</td>
        <td>25 (31.6)</td>
        <td>39 (31.5)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>31 (68.9)</td>
        <td>54 (68.4)</td>
        <td>85 (68.5)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Vomiting</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>13 (28.9)</td>
        <td>18 (22.8)</td>
        <td>31 (25.0)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>32 (71.1)</td>
        <td>61 (77.2)</td>
        <td>93 (75.0)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Headache</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Yes</td>
        <td>10 (22.2)</td>
        <td>20 (25.3)</td>
        <td>30 (24.2)</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>No</td>
        <td>35 (77.8)</td>
        <td>59 (74.4)</td>
        <td>94 (75.8)</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
<p><bold>Discussion</bold></p>
<p>This study assessed <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> positivity and
risk factors among individuals with gastrointestinal symptoms in Laghman
and Nangarhar provinces, revealing a higher positivity rate in Nangarhar
(10.6%) than in Laghman (7.5%). Notably, the positivity rate in Laghman
was lower than in most provinces except Wardak, while Nangarhar exceeded
those in Wardak, Khost, and Kabul (18, 20, 21).</p>
<p>Several significant risk factors for <italic>G. intestinalis</italic>
infection were identified in Laghman, including male sex, domestic
animal ownership, soil contact, swimming in unregulated water bodies,
consumption of untreated or unfiltered water, and seasonal variations in
positivity rates. The significantly higher positivity rates of
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic> among males in Laghman align with
findings from Khost and Pakistan (21, 31). The increased prevalence in
males may be due to their more active role in society, particularly in
outdoor work and agriculture, which expose them to higher infection
risks. In Laghman, the primary livelihood is agriculture and farming,
involving close contact with livestock, soil, and water – potential
sources of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> contamination. A study in
Iraq supports this, linking the higher prevalence in males to their
increased activity in public places and workplaces, as well as greater
exposure to infection through eating and drinking at street vendors
(32).</p>
<p>Domestic animal ownership (80%) and soil contact (77.8%) showed
strong associations with increased transmission, likely due to zoonotic
exposure and inadequate hygiene following soil contact. The zoonotic
potential of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> has been highlighted in
several studies, especially in its transmission between animals and
humans through direct contact or contaminated environments. For example,
in India, <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> subtype AI was detected in
both calves and farmers working on the same farm (33). Soil contact
contributes to infection, specifically in areas where animal manure and
human waste are used as fertilizers, facilitating zoonotic and
anthroponotic transmission. This is consistent with the findings of Resi
et al., who identified a significant link between gardening activities
and elevated positivity rates (34). In Laghman, where agriculture is the
primary livelihood, year-round exposure to livestock, soil, and water
sources further heightens the risk of infection, as individuals
frequently interact with potential sources of contamination.</p>
<p>Waterborne transmission of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> is a
significant concern, particularly in regions with inadequate water
treatment and sanitation infrastructure. In most provinces of
Afghanistan, including Laghman, there are no formal swimming pools. The
primary swimming areas for locals are the unregulated natural water
bodies, such as lakes, rivers, and agricultural reservoirs. In Northern
Greece, 66.2% of surface water samples were contaminated with <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> (35). In the present study, individuals in Laghman
exhibited a higher tendency to swim, thereby increasing their exposure
to <italic>G. intestinalis,</italic> as water bodies are susceptible to
contamination by parasites and their cysts. Contributing factors to this
contamination may include poor drainage systems and runoff from fields
fertilized with animal and human waste. A similar association was found
between the prevalence of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> and swimming
in contaminated pools (36). This association has also been reported in
other studies, particularly those documenting similar outbreaks in
swimming pools (37-39). These observations underscore the importance of
public health initiatives aimed at educating communities about safe
swimming practices, as well as the need for the government to establish
regulated swimming pools for the public and ensure their regular
disinfection to mitigate the risks associated with waterborne
transmission.</p>
<p>The consumption of untreated hand pump water was a significant risk
factor in Laghman (<italic>P</italic>=0.001), consistent with studies
linking higher positivity rates to limited access to safe drinking water
(13, 17, 40). Insufficient access to clean water can increase the
infection risk by up to 14% (6), emphasizing the critical need for
improved water treatment and filtration systems in areas with limited
access to potable water.</p>
<p>Seasonal variations were also significant in Laghman, with <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> infections peaking in autumn, followed by summer,
spring, and winter (<italic>P</italic>=0.016). This autumn peak aligns
with findings from Canada, where positivity rates also surged in early
autumn (41). These seasonal trends are likely influenced by
environmental factors such as temperature and rainfall, which impact the
survival and transmission of the parasite.</p>
<p>In Nangarhar, sex, age, monthly income, and seasonal variations were
significantly associated with <italic>G. intestinalis</italic>. Females
exhibited a significantly higher positivity rate compared to males. This
finding is consistent with a study in Ethiopia, which also reported a
higher prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections, including
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic>, among females, attributing it to their
exposure through household tasks such as food preparation, cleaning, and
collecting water (42). The significant association between age and
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic> positivity in Nangarhar suggests that
younger individuals may be at greater risk, likely due to higher
exposure to contaminated sources. This aligns with the findings of other
studies conducted both within Afghanistan and in other countries (18,
20, 43).</p>
<p>Interestingly, despite global trends showing higher infection rates
in low-income groups, our study found greater prevalence among
higher-income individuals in Nangarhar. The positivity rates in human
populations range from 4% to 43% in low-income and 1% to 7% in
high-income countries (44). Many studies have reported a high prevalence
in low-income populations (45). However, our findings revealed a higher
prevalence among higher-income individuals in Nangarhar. Although
limited data exists on risk factors for high-income populations,
insights from Krumrie et al.’s recent study identify contaminated water
and contact with diaper-wearing children as the two most common risk
factors in higher-income communities (46). Many individuals in Nangarhar
are involved in trade and businesses, which may expose them to the
endemic regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan along the Torkham route. As
a result, their families may also be at risk, potentially contributing
to the higher prevalence in this population. The involvement of chefs
and food handlers from low-income families further facilitates disease
transmission. A study by AL-Mekhlafi et al. found a prevalence of 4.4%
among food handlers in Yemen, while Aber et al. found a higher
prevalence of 7.0% among food handlers in Ethiopia. Both studies
suggested an association between untrained and unhygienic food handlers
and food-borne transmission of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> (47,
48). Other studies also support the anthroponotic transmission of
specific <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> assemblages<italic>,</italic>
particularly among adults involved in diaper changing and cleaning
children in the daycare center (49).</p>
<p>Seasonal variations of positivity rates in Nangarhar revealed higher
positivity rates in the summer, followed by spring, autumn, and winter
(<italic>P</italic>=0.045). This pattern is consistent with findings
from other studies conducted within the country, including those in
Wardak and Kandahar provinces (17, 20), as well as in other countries
such as the US, Canada, and the UK, where giardiasis exhibited a more
pronounced peak during the summer (50, 51).</p>
<p>The comparative analysis between the two provinces revealed that
several risk factors were consistent with those identified in individual
provincial analyses. Notably, the positivity rate was significantly
higher among males in Laghman compared to Nangarhar. In contrast,
although females in Nangarhar exhibited higher positivity rates, this
difference was not statistically significant. These findings are
consistent with previous research. For instance, Khudhair reported
sex-based differences in prevalence across three cities in Northern
Iraq, with higher prevalence among males in Hawler and females in
Chamchamal and Soran (52). Several factors may contribute to the
observed differences between males and females. Differences in exposure
to contaminated water, occupational roles, or hygiene practices may
cause these sex disparities. Further investigation is needed to explore
the underlying causes of these sex-specific differences in <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> transmission.</p>
<p>Other significant risk factors included soil contact, swimming in
unregulated water bodies, and domestic animal ownership, reinforcing
their importance in the epidemiology of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic>
in Laghman. In Nangarhar, a high monthly income was identified as a
significant risk factor in the separate and comparative analyses. This
consistent finding suggests a potential link between socioeconomic
status and the positivity rate of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> in
Nangarhar, indicating the need for further studies to explore this
association.</p>
<p>Although seasonal variations were significant in each province, with
autumn peaks in Laghman and summer peaks in Nangarhar, no significant
difference was observed in the comparative analysis of the two
provinces. This may be due to prolonged warm climates in both
provinces.</p>
<p>Children aged 5 to 14 exhibited the highest rates of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> infection in both provinces (Figures 1 and 2).
This pattern reflects a combination of environmental exposure and
infrastructural limitations specific to the region. In rural
Afghanistan, children in this age group often participate in farming and
animal husbandry, which increases their contact with contaminated soil,
untreated water sources, and animal waste. The lack of safe recreational
alternatives means children swim in polluted rivers and irrigation
canals, further elevating their exposure. Many schools lack functional
toilets, access to clean drinking water, and proper handwashing
facilities, all of which significantly contribute to the risk of
transmission. Additionally, overcrowded classrooms with poor conditions
create a setting conducive to the spread of infection. These
interrelated factors likely explain the heightened burden of <italic>G.
intestinalis</italic> among school-aged children in these
communities.</p>
<p>In this study, using a single stool sample per patient likely led to
an underdiagnosis of <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> infections, given
the known limitations of this method. The sensitivity of microscopy
using a single sample is approximately 46%, while examining three
samples over 3–5 d increases accuracy to 94% (53). However, even this
approach has proven to be less sensitive than ELISA. For instance, in a
study involving Polish soldiers in Ghazni, Afghanistan, microscopy
detected a positivity rate of 2.7%, whereas ELISA identified a
significantly higher rate of 18.1% (19). Similarly, among children in
Pakistan, microscopy found a prevalence of 2.75%, while ELISA detected
9.5% (40). Despite these differences, microscopic examination of three
stool samples per patient remains the gold standard for routine
diagnosis, while ELISA and other more sensitive methods are recommended
in cases where clinical symptoms persist despite negative microscopy
results (54).</p>
<p>Hygiene and sanitation also play a critical role in preventing
<italic>G. intestinalis</italic> infection, as highlighted by a
comparison of soldiers deployed in Afghanistan. German soldiers adhering
to strict food and water hygiene protocols exhibited a positivity rate
of 1.3% (55), whereas Polish soldiers without comparable sanitary
measures showed a significantly higher positivity rate of 18.1% (19).
This contrast underscores the importance of sanitation and access to
clean water in controlling the transmission.</p>
<p><bold>Conclusion</bold></p>
<p>This study detected <italic>G. intestinalis</italic> in 7.5% of
symptomatic individuals in Laghman and 10.6% in Nangarhar, indicating a
notable burden among those with gastrointestinal complaints. Sex was a
significant factor in both provinces, while age was associated with
infection only in Nangarhar, suggesting regional epidemiological
differences. Since the sample included only symptomatic individuals, the
findings may underestimate community prevalence, particularly of
asymptomatic cases. The lack of data on co-infections limits
understanding of the parasite’s specific clinical impact. Future
research should employ community-based sampling, utilize sensitive
diagnostics such as ELISA or PCR, and evaluate co-infections to better
estimate the prevalence and disease burden.</p>
<p><bold>Funding</bold></p>
<p>No financial source was received for this study.</p>
<p><bold>Acknowledgements</bold></p>
<p>We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Directorate
Board of Ghalib University, Kabul, Afghanistan, for their support. We
also extend our heartfelt thanks to Christen Rune Stensvold for his
valuable assistance with reviewing the manuscript.</p>
<p><bold>Conflict of interest</bold></p>
<p>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.</p>
<p><bold>References</bold></p>
<list list-type="order">
  <list-item>
    <p>Tapia-Veloz E, Gozalbo M, Guillén M, Dashti A, Bailo B, Köster
    PC, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of intestinal
    parasites among schoolchildren in Ecuador, with emphasis on the
    molecular diversity of <italic>Giardia duodenalis</italic>,
    <italic>Blastocystis</italic> sp. and <italic>Enterocytozoon
    bieneusi</italic>. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17(5):e0011339.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Brožová K, Jirků M, Lhotská Z, Květoňová D, Kadlecová O,
    Stensvold CR, et al. The opportunistic protist, <italic>Giardia
    intestinalis</italic>, occurs in gut-healthy humans in a high-income
    country. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2023;12(2):2270077.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Rosenthal PJ. Giardiasis. In: Papadakis MA, McPhee SJ, Rabow MW,
    McQuaid KR, Gandhi M, editors. Current Medical Diagnosis &amp;
    Treatment 2024. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2024.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Kalavani S, Matin S, Rahmanian V, Meshkin A, Taghipour A, Abdoli
    A. Prevalence of <italic>Giardia duodenalis</italic> among Asian
    children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Health.
    2024;16(2):133-143.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Mahdavi F, Mohammadi MR, Shamsi L, Asghari A, Shahabi S,
    Motazedian MH. Clinical Manifestations and Molecular Identification
    of <italic>Giardia duodenalis</italic> in Pediatric and Adolescent
    Cancer Patients in Southwestern Iran. Foodborne Pathog Dis.
    2025;22(7):498-504.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Fakhri Y, Daraei H, Ghaffari HR, Rezapour-Nasrabad R,
    Soleimani-Ahmadi M, Khedher KM, et al. The risk factors for
    intestinal <italic>Giardia</italic> spp infection: global systematic
    review and meta-analysis and meta-regression. Acta Trop.
    2021;220:105968.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Abedi SH, Fazlzadeh A, Mollalo A, Sartip B, Mahjour S, Bahadory
    S, et al. The neglected role of <italic>Blastocystis</italic> sp.
    and <italic>Giardia lamblia</italic> in development of irritable
    bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb
    Pathog. 2022;162:105215.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Hanevik K, Kristoffersen E, Mørch K, Rye KP, Sørnes S, Svärd S,
    et al. <italic>Giardia</italic>-specific cellular immune responses
    in post-giardiasis chronic fatigue syndrome. BMC Immunol.
    2017;18(1):5.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Allain T, Buret AG. Pathogenesis and post-infectious
    complications in giardiasis. Adv Parasitol. 2020;107:173-199.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Hajare ST, Chekol Y, Chauhan NM. Assessment of prevalence of
    <italic>Giardia lamblia</italic> infection and its associated
    factors among government elementary school children from Sidama
    zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264812.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Kalavani S, Matin S, Rahmanian V, Meshkin A, Mazidi BB, Taghipour
    A, et al. Prevalence of <italic>Giardia duodenalis</italic> among
    African children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasite
    Epidemiol Control. 2024;26:e00365.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Rahimi BA, Mahboobi BA, Wafa MH, Sahrai MS, Stanikzai MH, Taylor
    WR. Prevalence and associated risk factors of soil-transmitted
    helminth infections in Kandahar, Afghanistan. BMC Infect Dis.
    2022;22(1):361.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Rahimi BA, Rafiqi N, Tareen Z, Kakar KA, Wafa MH, Stanikzai MH,
    et al. Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminths and associated risk
    factors among primary school children in Kandahar, Afghanistan: A
    cross-sectional analytical study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis.
    2023;17(9):e0011614.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Lass A, Karanis P, Korzeniewski K. First detection and genotyping
    of <italic>Giardia intestinalis</italic> in stool samples collected
    from children in Ghazni Province, eastern Afghanistan and evaluation
    of the PCR assay in formalin-fixed specimens. Parasitol Res.
    2017;116(8):2255-2264.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Korzeniewski K, Chung WC, Augustynowicz A, Lass A, Ik KJ. Current
    status of intestinal parasitic infections among inhabitants of the
    Ghazni and Parwan Provinces, Afghanistan. J Family Med Prim Care.
    2017;19:23–28.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Korzeniewski K, Smoleń A, Augustynowicz A, Lass A. Diagnostics of
    intestinal parasites in light microscopy among the population of
    children in eastern Afghanistan. Ann Agric Environ Med.
    2016;23(4):666-670.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Elyan D, Wasfy M, El Mohammady H, Hassan K, Monestersky J,
    Noormal B, et al. Non-bacterial etiologies of diarrheal diseases in
    Afghanistan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014;108(8):461-465.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Tariq MT. Prevalence of Giardiasis in Afghan population. Pak
    Pediatr J. 2013;37(3):180-84.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Korzeniewski K, Konior M, Augustynowicz A, Lass A, Kowalska E.
    Detection of <italic>Giardia intestinalis</italic> infections in
    Polish soldiers deployed to Afghanistan. Int Marit Health.
    2016;67(4):243-247.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Asad M, Noori MY, Mehrpoor AJ. Evaluation the Prevalence of
    Giardiasis and associated factors in Wardak province, center of
    Afghanistan. Afghan J Infect Dis. 2024;2(2):51-56.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Nekmal TS, Jan R. Prevalence of <italic>Giardia lamblia</italic>
    in Stool Samples of Diarrhea Patients in Khost, Afghanistan.
    Integr. J. Res. Arts Humanities. 2023;3(3):8-11.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Haq KU, Gul NA, Hammad HM, Bibi Y, Bibi A, Mohsan J. Prevalence
    of <italic>Giardia intestinalis</italic> and Hymenolepis nana in
    Afghan refugee population of Mianwali district, Pakistan. Afr Health
    Sci. 2015;15(2):394-400.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Momen Heravi M, Rasti S, Vakili Z, Moraveji A, Hosseini F.
    Prevalence of intestinal parasites infections among Afghan children
    of primary and junior high schools residing Kashan city, Iran,
    2009-2010. Iran J Med Microbio. 2013;7(1):46-52.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Ekdahl K, Andersson Y. Imported giardiasis: impact of
    international travel, immigration, and adoption. Am J Trop Med Hyg.
    2005;72(6):825-830.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Sanati Pour M, Kumble S, Hanieh S, Biggs B-A. Prevalence of
    dyslipidaemia and micronutrient deficiencies among newly arrived
    Afghan refugees in rural Australia: a cross-sectional study. BMC
    Public Health. 2014;14:896.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Smati H, Hassan N, Essar MY, Abdaly F, Noori S, Grewal R, et al.
    Health status and care utilization among Afghan refugees newly
    resettled in Calgary, Canada between 2011-2020. medRxiv.
    2024:2024.06. 21.24309182.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Johnson TH, Adamec LW. Historical dictionary of Afghanistan.
    Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2021 May 15.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Rasikh Zu, Joolaie R, Keramatzadeh A, Mirkarimi S, Niazi S.
    Management of the Cropping Pattern of Selected Crops in Afghanistan
    (Case Study: Nangarhar Province).</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>National Statistics and Information Authority (NSIA). Estimated
    population of Afghanistan 2023–24 [Internet]. Kabul: NSIA; 2023
    [cited 2024 Oct 19]. Available from:
    <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://nsia.gov.af:8443/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/براورد-نفوس-کشور-سال-1402-05.pdf">https://nsia.gov.af:8443/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/براورد-نفوس-کشور-سال-1402-05.pdf</ext-link></p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Mathan VI. Diarrhoeal diseases. Br Med Bull.
    1998;54(2):407-419.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Nisar M, Khan F, Ahmad N, Ullah S, Ullah A, Farooqi MW.
    Geographic And Demographic Influences on The Epidemiological
    Patterns of <italic>Giardia lamblia</italic> Infection in Rural
    Sites District Swat. Indus J Biosci. Res. 2024;2(02):103-110.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Hasan TA, Muhaimid AK, Mahmoud AR. Epidemiological study of
    <italic>Giardia lamblia</italic> in Tikrit city, Iraq. Sys Rev
    Pharm. 2020;11(9):102-106.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Khan SM, Debnath C, Pramanik AK, Xiao L, Nozaki T, Ganguly S.
    Molecular evidence for zoonotic transmission of <italic>Giardia
    duodenalis</italic> among dairy farm workers in West Bengal, India.
    Vet Parasitol. 2011;178(3-4):342-345.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Resi D, Varani S, Sannella AR, De Pascali AM, Ortalli M, Liguori
    G, et al. A large outbreak of giardiasis in a municipality of the
    Bologna province, north-eastern Italy, November 2018 to April 2019.
    Euro Surveill. 2021;26(35):2001331.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Ligda P, Claerebout E, Kostopoulou D, Zdragas A, Casaert S,
    Robertson LJ, et al. Cryptosporidium and <italic>Giardia</italic> in
    surface water and drinking water: Animal sources and towards the use
    of a machine-learning approach as a tool for predicting
    contamination. Environ Pollut. 2020;264:114766.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Snel S, Baker M, Kamalesh V, French N, Learmonth J. A tale of two
    parasites: the comparative epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis and
    giardiasis. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(11):1641-1650.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Reses H, Gargano J, Liang J, Cronquist A, Smith K, Collier S, et
    al. Risk factors for sporadic <italic>Giardia</italic> infection in
    the USA: a case-control study in Colorado and Minnesota. Epidemiol
    Infect. 2018;146(9):1071-1078.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Gray S, Gunnell D, Peters T. Risk factors for giardiasis: a
    case-control study in Avon and Somerset. Epidemiol Infect.
    1994;113(1):95-102.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Porter JD, Ragazzoni HP, Buchanon JD, Waskin HA, Juranek DD,
    Parkin WE. <italic>Giardia</italic> transmission in a swimming pool.
    Ame J Public Health. 1988;78(6):659-662.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Naz A, Nawaz Z, Rasool MH, Zahoor MA. Cross-sectional
    epidemiological investigations of <italic>Giardia lamblia</italic>
    in children in Pakistan. Sao Paulo Med J. 2018;136(5):449-453.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Odoi A, Martin SW, Michel P, Holt J, Middleton D, Wilson J.
    Geographical and temporal distribution of human giardiasis in
    Ontario, Canada. Int J Health Geogr. 2003;2(1):5.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Ali I, Mekete G, Wodajo N. Intestinal parasitism and related risk
    factors among students of Asendabo Elementary and Junior Secondary
    School, South Western Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Health Dev.
    1999;13(2):157-161.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Barasa E, Indieka B, Shaviya N, Osoro E, Maloba G, Mukhongo D, et
    al. Assemblages and Subassemblages of <italic>Giardia
    duodenalis</italic> in Rural Western, Kenya: Association with
    Sources, Signs, and Symptoms. J Parasitol Res.
    2024;2024(1):1180217.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Waldram A, Vivancos R, Hartley C, Lamden K. Prevalence of
    <italic>Giardia</italic> infection in households of
    <italic>Giardia</italic> cases and risk factors for household
    transmission. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):486.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Nundy S, Gilman RH, Xiao L, Cabrera L, Cama R, Ortega YR, et al.
    Wealth and its associations with enteric parasitic infections in a
    low-income community in Peru: use of principal component analysis.
    Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84(1):38.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Krumrie S, Capewell P, Smith-Palmer A, Mellor D, Weir W,
    Alexander CL. A scoping review of risk factors and transmission
    routes associated with human giardiasis outbreaks in high-income
    settings. Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2022;2:100084.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>AL-Mekhlafi AM, Al-Moyed KA, Al-Ghaithi GAAA, Al-Shamahy HA,
    Al-Haddad AM (2023) Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of
    Intestinal Protozoa and Parasites Among Food Handlers in Ibb City,
    Yemen. Ann Clin Med Cas Rep Rev: 114</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Abera B, Biadegelgen F, Bezabih B. Prevalence of
    <italic>Salmonella</italic> <italic>typhi</italic> and intestinal
    parasites among food handlers in Bahir Dar Town, Northwest Ethiopia.
    Ethiop J Health Dev. 2010;24(1).</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Oliveira-Arbex AP, David EB, Oliveira-Sequeira TC, Bittencourt
    GN, Guimarães S. Genotyping of <italic>Giardia duodenalis</italic>
    isolates in asymptomatic children attending daycare centre: evidence
    of high risk for anthroponotic transmission. Epidemiol Infect.
    2016;144(7):1418-1428.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Mohamed AS, Levine M, Camp Jr JW, Lund E, Yoder JS, Glickman LT,
    et al. Temporal patterns of human and canine
    <italic>Giardia</italic> infection in the United States: 2003-2009.
    Prev Vet Med. 2014;113(2):249-256.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Lal A, Hales S, French N, Baker MG. Seasonality in human zoonotic
    enteric diseases: a systematic review. PLoS One.
    2012;7(4):e31883.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Khudhair AA: Prevalence of <italic>Giardia lamblia</italic> among
    resident of Hawler, Soran and Chamchamal Cities, North of Iraq.
    Pak-Euro J Med Life Sci. 2020;3:28-36.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Jahan N, Khatoon R, Ahmad S. A Comparison of Microscopy and
    Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Diagnosis of <italic>Giardia
    lamblia</italic> in Human Faecal Specimens. J Clin Diagn Res.
    2014;8(11):DC04-DC6.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Vicente B, Freitas A, Freitas M, Midlej V. Systematic Review of
    Diagnostic Approaches for Human Giardiasis: Unveiling Optimal
    Strategies. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(4):364.</p>
  </list-item>
  <list-item>
    <p>Frickmann H, Schwarz NG, Wiemer DF, et al. Food and drinking
    water hygiene and intestinal</p>
  </list-item>
</list>
</body>
<back>
</back>
</article>
